WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:17.100
Hello everyone, my name is Vasily Kigaz Yaki and I'm working with Whitturated International

00:17.100 --> 00:23.160
is a small non-profit organization based in Berlin and today I'm going to talk about the

00:23.160 --> 00:28.440
beyond compliance project and the work we do at Whitturated Together with Walk Free, Walk

00:28.440 --> 00:37.200
Free is an organization, a human rights organization that focuses on tackling motor slavery.

00:37.200 --> 00:42.920
So in this presentation I'm going to talk about how we do assessments or motor slavery

00:42.920 --> 00:54.480
statements, our approach to research and what the results showcase about corporate reporting

00:54.480 --> 00:57.160
on motor slavery.

00:57.160 --> 01:02.320
So before we dive into the project I would like to take a minute to talk a little bit about

01:02.320 --> 01:09.600
motor slavery and I'm pretty sure that everyone has heard the term before.

01:09.600 --> 01:21.600
A motor slavery as a term includes a set of legal concepts and includes including

01:21.600 --> 01:28.080
forced labor that bond its force merits and human trafficking.

01:28.080 --> 01:34.000
The truth is that it is a still a significant issue globally and impacts millions of

01:34.000 --> 01:36.280
people worldwide.

01:36.280 --> 01:42.000
It is estimated that more than 50 million people today are affected by motor slavery

01:42.000 --> 01:48.200
and at least 28 million of people are enforced labor.

01:48.200 --> 01:54.080
The reality is that the products that we buy and use daily from our clothes to our electronics

01:54.080 --> 02:02.120
can access the motor slavery as forced labor still persists in supply chains of many industries.

02:02.120 --> 02:06.200
So what can we do to prevent motor slavery?

02:06.200 --> 02:12.640
We actually need really strong motor slavery legislation that protects all work with

02:12.680 --> 02:16.280
the supply chains and holds companies accountable.

02:16.280 --> 02:20.960
Companies must ensure supply chains are guaranteed to identify and address motor slavery

02:20.960 --> 02:21.960
risks.

02:21.960 --> 02:25.640
There is a little bit of a reluctance from companies to publish the suppliers because they

02:25.640 --> 02:31.040
think they lose competitive advantage, but the truth is without supply chain transparency

02:31.040 --> 02:34.200
is very difficult to tackle motor slavery.

02:34.200 --> 02:38.640
Companies must engage in combating motor slavery by taking responsibility of their operation

02:38.640 --> 02:41.600
and the partnerships.

02:41.600 --> 02:47.960
So the UK and Australian motor slavery acts were among the first laws that came into place

02:47.960 --> 02:50.360
specifically address motor slavery.

02:50.360 --> 02:57.080
There require companies above certain revenue thresholds to produce annual motor slavery

02:57.080 --> 03:02.120
statements and they aim to increase transparency in global supply chains.

03:02.120 --> 03:11.520
Later more laws came into action in different countries, but in our project we are focusing

03:11.520 --> 03:17.000
on the UK and Australian motor slavery act.

03:17.000 --> 03:24.880
So since 2016, we curate and work free have partnered to analyze motor slavery statements.

03:24.880 --> 03:32.040
Using in the beginning 18 and then we extended to 21 criteria, we have assessed over 2000

03:32.040 --> 03:40.280
statements and thousands of contributors and volunteers have participated to this project

03:40.280 --> 03:46.600
and we have engaged for at least 20 universities.

03:46.600 --> 03:54.440
So the motor slavery laws ask companies to report on motor slavery.

03:54.440 --> 03:58.360
And the question that we had in the beginning of the project was are the companies treating

03:58.360 --> 04:03.560
that as a ticking box exercise or are they taking any measures to actually combat motor

04:03.560 --> 04:08.880
slavery and they are going actually beyond the compliance of the law.

04:08.880 --> 04:12.120
So how do we do the research?

04:12.120 --> 04:17.840
We are taking an open and community driven approach.

04:17.840 --> 04:23.120
So our approach is based on community building and crowdsourcing.

04:23.120 --> 04:28.880
We have a global community and volunteers that assess the motor slavery statements.

04:28.880 --> 04:31.520
We have accessible metrics we make.

04:31.560 --> 04:39.280
We try to simplify the metrics in a sense that we allow an enable participants from

04:39.280 --> 04:44.040
diverse background to participate with this project.

04:44.040 --> 04:49.200
Our methodology is open and transparent.

04:49.200 --> 04:56.040
Even when it comes to analysis we try to make our methodology as transparent as possible.

04:56.040 --> 04:58.960
And we follow an open data approach.

04:59.000 --> 05:02.040
I think we think this is really important.

05:02.040 --> 05:09.520
All the results and the data are licensed under creative commons for point to owe by attribution.

05:09.520 --> 05:17.520
And in a sense that we want to allow other civil society organizations to use this data for advocacy.

05:17.520 --> 05:23.120
Researchers and also even investors if they want to use this data to see what companies

05:23.120 --> 05:26.440
that they invest in do to tackle motor slavery.

05:26.480 --> 05:31.720
And also when it comes to research, we want to think that we empower a little bit.

05:31.720 --> 05:36.240
We do a little bit of power and through education that we educate a little bit.

05:36.240 --> 05:41.720
The volunteers on topics like Monteslavery.

05:41.720 --> 05:47.560
So the most important aspect of our approach is our community.

05:47.560 --> 05:53.880
In the beginning, every year we do a couple of rounds of research.

05:53.880 --> 05:57.000
And we have an open call for volunteers.

05:57.000 --> 06:02.520
We have a passion and knowledgeable volunteers in our partners network and in our network as well.

06:02.520 --> 06:07.800
We're training them on the metrics and on the platform that we do the research.

06:07.800 --> 06:12.680
And we have regular cut ups with them and we have a Slack channel that we are communicating

06:12.680 --> 06:16.840
and they can raise questions if they have any.

06:16.840 --> 06:23.320
And we always analyze the contributors in the reports that we are producing in our communications.

06:23.320 --> 06:27.400
And in any chance we have.

06:27.400 --> 06:32.120
So the research process includes several steps.

06:32.120 --> 06:38.920
So in the beginning, we make sure that we have comprehensive and clear methodologies for assessments.

06:38.920 --> 06:43.640
To make it as easy as possible for them to proceed with their assessments.

06:43.640 --> 06:47.720
We allocate the companies among contributors.

06:47.720 --> 06:52.600
And we collect the data and the research comments in one place.

06:52.600 --> 06:59.080
And we do peer reviewers and quality assurance of also the final research.

06:59.080 --> 07:04.600
And at the end of the cycle, we do refine the pathologies based on the feedback that we get

07:04.600 --> 07:13.240
from the volunteers for the next round to have some better guidance in place.

07:13.240 --> 07:18.760
So the research is done using Wikivate.org, the Wikivate platform.

07:18.760 --> 07:22.600
And so for any of you that you are not familiar, I think most of you,

07:22.600 --> 07:28.440
Wikivate is an open data, open source and open research platform that brings corporate

07:28.440 --> 07:31.880
environmental, social and governance data in one place,

07:31.880 --> 07:36.920
making accessible, comparable and free for everyone.

07:36.920 --> 07:43.720
So the research of the platform is actually organized around research projects.

07:43.720 --> 07:51.080
In these projects, we have certain metrics, we define certain metrics that we want

07:51.080 --> 07:56.440
our volunteers to research and also center companies that we want them to research.

07:56.440 --> 08:02.360
So this is a research project for research and model slavery statements.

08:02.360 --> 08:12.440
Here the volunteer wants to research the collaborations and memberships metric

08:13.400 --> 08:18.520
to see if the company engages with any nonprofit organizations that they do

08:18.520 --> 08:26.520
multislavery work and they have to select the year that they want to research,

08:26.520 --> 08:32.280
then they try to find if there is an existing source of the platform.

08:32.280 --> 08:36.440
So there is already a multislavery statement for the company there.

08:36.440 --> 08:40.920
So they go ahead, very view and read the multislavery statement,

08:40.920 --> 08:47.720
they find the answer and they select the source and then they have to answer the question

08:48.760 --> 08:53.480
and leave comments citing where they find exactly the answer in the document.

08:57.480 --> 09:09.000
So and then the next important step is data verification, the verification of the answers.

09:09.000 --> 09:16.680
So we consider in which you read that one answer is verified when more than one person

09:16.680 --> 09:24.760
have actually came to the same conclusion. So the volunteers, they go ahead and they are

09:24.760 --> 09:28.920
assigned a different company that they have to check, double check, they work that

09:30.200 --> 09:36.920
some other volunteer has done. So here we have the gap incorporation and here we have

09:36.920 --> 09:43.960
actually the volunteer reviewing the answer, they can go back, they can see the comments and

09:43.960 --> 09:53.080
they can also review again the source and they can find out if indeed the answer that the previous

09:53.080 --> 10:00.600
researcher found is correct and they go ahead either of their flagging, the answer or they confirm

10:00.600 --> 10:11.080
the answer. So here they have verified the answer on the platform and yeah that is also a part of.

10:12.920 --> 10:21.720
So another ingredient when it comes to the metrics is that at Wikirate we have different types

10:21.720 --> 10:27.800
of metrics, we have research metrics and calculated metrics, research metrics, function as building

10:27.800 --> 10:38.120
blocks for analysis and on top of research metrics we can write coffee scripts formulas to

10:38.120 --> 10:43.160
actually pool data from different metrics and come to a certain conclusion. For instance for the

10:43.160 --> 10:49.560
UK and Australia Motors Library, there are different criteria that the companies have to address

10:49.640 --> 10:56.200
in the Motors Library statements. So through the calculated metrics we can pool

10:57.480 --> 11:04.360
the data in one metric and he've answered to additional questions. So here we have this

11:04.360 --> 11:13.480
an example of a calculated metric which is if the company needs the minimum criteria under the

11:13.480 --> 11:18.200
UK Motors Library legislation you can see the input metrics and also the formula that is

11:18.200 --> 11:24.920
written in coffee script. There are three mandatory criteria plus to that we have to make sure that

11:26.120 --> 11:33.800
at least the statement have fully assessed by the researchers before we pool an answer to the

11:35.720 --> 11:45.080
to the platform. So here you can also see a little bit more granularity, you can see the calculated

11:45.080 --> 11:58.680
answer and then the underlying answers from this metric. So what are we find? What the research

11:58.680 --> 12:07.160
reveal? Before we go to the results of the project, I would like to just remind you the initial

12:07.160 --> 12:12.280
question that we have when we started the project and especially the first part of the question

12:12.280 --> 12:18.680
are the companies treating the statements as a taking box exercise. We actually consider that

12:19.480 --> 12:27.080
at least the companies report and meet the minimum requirements so they address all the requirements

12:27.080 --> 12:33.000
that the law states. But this is was not the case so only 25% of companies

12:33.880 --> 12:43.080
reporting their obligations under the relevant MSA, measures library legislation. So 75% of

12:43.080 --> 12:50.840
companies fail to meet the minimum criteria and that showcases a big compliance gap. There is a

12:50.840 --> 12:57.000
lack of transparency 50% of the statements disclose no information on the companies apply chains

12:57.000 --> 13:04.440
and 86% do not report any incidents. There is an absence of worker centric policies, 88%

13:04.440 --> 13:10.840
of the statements do not disclose direct worker mediation. There is an overlook on modern slavery

13:10.840 --> 13:17.800
risks, 52% of companies have not identified any modern slavery risks within their operations

13:18.520 --> 13:24.680
and supply chains. And there was a lack of remediation on policies, 51% of companies do not

13:24.760 --> 13:29.400
disclose having remediation policies in place to respond incidents of modern slavery.

13:30.280 --> 13:39.000
So there was also a limited risk beyond tier one, 74% of companies do not have

13:39.000 --> 13:45.160
any modern slavery policy that applies to stakeholders beyond the tier one suppliers.

13:45.880 --> 13:51.880
And the findings showcase that there is a long way to go before we can say companies

13:52.200 --> 14:04.200
do enough to prevent modern slavery risks. So how are the data used? In the context of these

14:04.200 --> 14:10.680
projects we have built a data dashboard to showcase and summarize the results of these projects.

14:10.680 --> 14:21.240
And our main goal was for our partners and other CSOS to use these two as an advocacy tool

14:21.240 --> 14:36.360
for policy change and business behavior change. So the research is not just numbers.

14:36.360 --> 14:44.440
There is a real life and real world impact on shaping policy. Our partners in work free

14:45.080 --> 14:51.320
over the years they have done data driven recommendations on the UK and Australia

14:51.320 --> 14:57.880
and modern slavery reviews. And we several adopted already in Australia.

14:59.000 --> 15:07.800
And the evidence from the research have been also used for advocacy on adoption for adoption

15:07.800 --> 15:15.960
on corporate stability due diligence and directive in the EU. But also it's not just policy.

15:17.080 --> 15:20.760
The research and the results of the research are saving business practices.

15:21.720 --> 15:27.800
Data on the UK companies responses were leveraged to inform updates to the UK,

15:27.800 --> 15:36.280
modern slavery guidance through the UK force labor forum. And actually work free also

15:36.280 --> 15:41.400
engages directly with businesses to improve the reporting and due diligence processes.

15:43.400 --> 15:51.000
So what's the future holds for the project? The project is ongoing. It keeps continues.

15:51.000 --> 16:01.400
And we want to support more assessments and we want to scale also the research.

16:01.400 --> 16:09.000
But the end of the month we're planning to integrate an annotated data set from

16:09.880 --> 16:16.120
Mela AI Institute of 5,000 fully assessed Australian modern slavery statements.

16:16.120 --> 16:22.040
And as a part of a pilot project for scaling up the resources we want to

16:23.480 --> 16:30.200
experiment on using an integrating Mela AI model into our pipeline to automate

16:30.840 --> 16:39.000
the assessment of new and unseen documents. So if you're interested in contributing,

16:41.000 --> 16:47.640
you can sign up to volunteer on this work. There are also different projects looking.

16:47.640 --> 16:53.160
Contributors is not only we're focusing on different topics, not only model slavery.

16:53.160 --> 17:01.560
And you can contact us to share ideas and form partnerships. And yeah, also we create

17:01.560 --> 17:07.560
is under an open license. And you can also create your own dashboards if you want to leverage

17:07.560 --> 17:14.280
any of the data set that exists already on the platform. And yeah, that was everything from my side.

17:14.280 --> 17:22.280
And thank you for all of you.

17:22.280 --> 17:30.280
Will you be taking questions?

17:30.280 --> 17:35.560
Do you want points for the talk? I'm curious if there's been any engagement from a policy

17:35.640 --> 17:42.520
to my case for you? If you can repeat?

17:42.520 --> 17:49.160
Yes, so the question was, if there was an engagement from policy makers based on the results,

17:49.160 --> 17:55.720
yeah, there were work free has already done several recommendations for

17:57.320 --> 17:59.960
making the law more strict.

18:00.360 --> 18:06.120
Some of them they have passed, some of them they are still working progress.

18:07.000 --> 18:12.520
So there is change, but usually when it comes to policy making things are getting a little bit more

18:12.520 --> 18:20.200
time, then they want that we would like to take especially in cases and in topics like Monterey slavery.

18:21.080 --> 18:31.000
I'd like to implement any questions. Many of the companies touched the reactant.

18:31.000 --> 18:37.000
Because if there's any like, this is like an open country process, or as we said for us,

18:39.000 --> 18:45.400
where you're going to get people to meet their revision and say we can so much and prove something.

18:46.360 --> 18:52.760
So first of all, does this happen in a second? Is this political figures or people?

18:58.760 --> 19:06.360
So the question was, if we had any reactions from companies when it comes to their

19:06.360 --> 19:10.120
to us reviewing their modest slavery statements,

19:10.280 --> 19:17.640
we didn't, we never had so far companies coming to us discussing their modest

19:17.640 --> 19:27.880
slavery, but work free specifically tries to engage with certain companies to help them improve

19:29.160 --> 19:36.040
their policies when it comes to how they report, but also to their due diligence processes.

19:36.760 --> 19:40.280
And the second part of the question, because there was a second part of the question, can you

19:40.280 --> 19:46.680
remind me? Yes. So you explain the same questions to multiple people and then you compare their

19:46.680 --> 19:57.480
answers, right? So the question was that if we present the same questions to different people

19:57.480 --> 20:04.200
and we compare the answers. No, we don't do that. What happens is we have one researcher,

20:04.200 --> 20:12.920
if you, the statement, and then we have another researcher come back and check if the answers

20:12.920 --> 20:19.240
that the other researchers have found are correct or not, based also on the comments and they

20:19.240 --> 20:23.640
can verify or not the answer that it was given by the researcher.

20:24.600 --> 20:30.520
Yeah, hello, thank you very much for sharing this. One thing we have seen with the

20:30.520 --> 20:36.200
change in the legislative landscape right now is with the corporate sustainability report in Europe,

20:36.760 --> 20:42.680
the things that companies have to say about ESG, they have to be assured by an auditor. Is there

20:42.680 --> 20:48.200
anything like that for the modern slavery statements so that you can tell if they're not lying?

20:48.280 --> 20:59.560
I don't think, sorry to repeat the question. Is there any auditors that have a look on

20:59.560 --> 21:09.000
the modern slavery statements? So, no, they're not any auditors to really say if indeed companies,

21:09.000 --> 21:16.600
but we do some complementary work on that. We have another project, they call value chains,

21:16.600 --> 21:24.760
and we try to research what happens in the factory level. So, if we have, for instance,

21:24.760 --> 21:30.040
what happened with wages, we have a lot of companies promising that they ensure living wages.

21:30.040 --> 21:35.240
And we go to the, we have partners that they are actually working on the ground and they're

21:35.240 --> 21:40.280
asking these questions, how much do you earn? And then we can say, okay, what the company says,

21:40.280 --> 21:45.720
they say yes, but we've seen like 10 factories, this is not the case, because they are not paid

21:45.720 --> 21:47.720
in the living wage.

22:16.680 --> 22:22.280
Okay, so the question was, and correct, if I didn't understood correct the question,

22:24.280 --> 22:33.320
if we have any processes in place for how we can hear a bit because I'm not sure that I understood

22:33.320 --> 22:34.120
the question.

22:34.120 --> 22:52.520
So, other projects that we are working on? So, we focusing specifically on corporate

22:52.520 --> 22:58.760
responsibility and sustainability. We have projects and we had projects in the past that they are

22:58.760 --> 23:04.520
researching, this is an ability developing goals on reports and sustainability reports that

23:04.520 --> 23:13.320
companies publish. But what we want to do, and this is in our plan for maybe one of the next

23:13.320 --> 23:23.800
two years, we want to try to bring not company reported data, because there is just what we see

23:23.880 --> 23:29.400
what the company says, but we want to find ways and we want to form collaborations with other

23:29.400 --> 23:35.800
parties in order to bring more data to verify what the company says about, this is an ability

23:35.800 --> 23:39.480
development goals or about motorslavery or about different topics.

